How would you implement an algorithm to find the smallest substring in a given string that contains all the characters of another string?

How would you implement an algorithm to find the smallest substring in a given string that contains all the characters of another string?

How would you implement an algorithm to find the smallest substring in a given string that contains all the characters of another string?

Approach

To effectively respond to the question of implementing an algorithm to find the smallest substring in a given string that contains all the characters of another string, follow this structured framework:

  1. Understand the Problem: Clearly define the inputs and outputs.

  2. Choose the Right Algorithm: Decide on an algorithmic approach (e.g., sliding window).

  3. Implement the Logic: Outline the steps required for the implementation.

  4. Optimize and Test: Ensure the solution is efficient and test it with different cases.

Key Points

  • Problem Definition: You are given two strings:

  • String S: The input string in which to search.

  • String T: The string containing the characters to find.

  • Output Requirement: The smallest substring of S that contains all characters of T.

  • Character Frequency: Consider the frequency of each character in T to compare against S.

  • Efficiency: Aim for a time complexity better than O(n^2) where n is the length of S.

Standard Response

To implement an algorithm that finds the smallest substring in string S that contains all characters of string T, we can utilize the sliding window technique combined with a hash map. Here's a detailed breakdown of the algorithm:

from collections import Counter, defaultdict

def min_window_substring(S: str, T: str) -> str:
 if not S or not T:
 return ""
 
 # Create a frequency map for characters in T
 dict_t = Counter(T)
 required = len(dict_t)
 
 # Left and right pointers
 l, r = 0, 0
 formed = 0
 window_counts = defaultdict(int)
 
 # Initialize the answer tuple
 ans = float("inf"), None, None # window length, left, right
 
 while r < len(S):
 character = S[r]
 window_counts[character] += 1
 
 # Check if current character is part of T
 if character in dict_t and window_counts[character] == dict_t[character]:
 formed += 1
 
 # Try to contract the window until it ceases to be 'desirable'
 while l <= r and formed == required:
 character = S[l]
 
 # Update the result if this window is smaller
 if r - l + 1 < ans[0]:
 ans = (r - l + 1, l, r)
 
 # The character at the position pointed by the left pointer is no longer a part of the window
 window_counts[character] -= 1
 if character in dict_t and window_counts[character] < dict_t[character]:
 formed -= 1
 
 # Move left pointer forward to shrink the window
 l += 1
 
 # Keep expanding the window by moving the right pointer
 r += 1
 
 # Return the smallest window or empty string if no such window exists
 return "" if ans[0] == float("inf") else S[ans[1]: ans[2] + 1]

# Example usage
S = "ADOBECODEBANC"
T = "ABC"
print(min_window_substring(S, T)) # Output: "BANC"

Tips & Variations

  • Not accounting for character frequency: Ensure you track how many of each character from T are needed.

  • Ignoring edge cases: Handle scenarios where T is longer than S or when either string is empty.

  • Overcomplicating the solution: Stick to the sliding window approach for clarity and efficiency.

  • Common Mistakes to Avoid:

  • For a technical role, focus on explaining the time and space complexity. Justify the use of Counter and defaultdict for efficient character counting.

  • For a managerial role, emphasize your problem-solving skills and ability to work under pressure, rather than the coding details.

  • Alternative Ways to Answer:

  • Technical Position: Discuss potential optimizations and edge case handling.

  • Creative Role: Highlight the importance of user experience and usability in presenting the results.

  • Managerial Position: Discuss how you would guide a team to implement this solution collectively.

  • Role-Specific Variations:

  • Can you explain the time complexity of your algorithm?

  • How would you handle cases with special characters or case sensitivity?

  • What alternative algorithms could you consider for this problem?

  • Follow-Up Questions:

By following this structured approach, candidates can articulate their thought process clearly, making it easier for interviewers to assess their problem-solving skills and technical knowledge

Ready to ace your next interview?

Ready to ace your next interview?

Ready to ace your next interview?

Practice with AI using real industry questions from top companies.

Practice with AI using real industry questions from top companies.

No credit card needed

No credit card needed